What's new
FORUMS - COASTERFORCE

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Your Least Common Opinion?

In the depths of the off-season in the UK and seeing all the content on Falcons Flight, it has got me reminiscing of how (ignoring Hyperia) borderline rubbish all of the rollercoasters are in the UK.

We don't have a choice, I guess, but Nostalgia or Lore, or whatever you want to call it is the only thing keeping UK enthusiasts visiting our parks.

Least Common Opinion, there's a few which follow but overarching opinion (which I imagine is becoming more common)....Alton Towers, our flagship park, is rubbish.

Take Nemesis for example, is it even good any more? It looks nice now, but it rides terribly. Do we all yearn for how it made us feel in the 90s and 00s. I think we do.

Wicker Man doesn't do anything, ever. It smells nice and that's its greatest quality. Never experienced airtime on there. Just lats. Lats don't get my juices going.

Galactica - get rid of it. It makes me incredibly sad. Remember the advert that came out and the shockwaves it sent through the community!? Back in the day it had a bit of wow factor. But I've grown to realise it's pathetic and it doesn't even smell nice (it smells rancid, actually).

Smiler is the rollercoaster equivalent of a flat ride. It's impressive, but you have to queue up in a rusty cage stood in dirty puddles and the theme, ride experience and roughness all combine to give you a headache.

Soft spot for Oblivion, it's the OG and still quite thrilling.

Actually feel like RITA is the best ride in the park because it's quite thrilling and in recent visits I've had a bit of flojector on the two hills.

Thirteen is a gimmick and the first drop is a literal trim break, wtf.

Horrific operations, terrible food and the walking is an absolute joke.
I don't know I feel like we have not a bad lineup to be honest. Sure it is not Germany stacked, but our lineup eclipses countries like Italy. Alton has indeed declined horribly agreed, but I feel Thorpe has kind of taken the 'best park' title now, and you have other players like BPB and Paultons to keep it interesting. Merlin are a mediocre operator but they do sometimes come through, building a Mack Hyper is evidence lol. Aramark obviously is the worst food ever, but operations I feel aren't too bad, at Thorpe anyway. Hyperia and Stealth seem to always be doing impressive dispatches.
 
Last edited:
I don't know I feel like we have not a bad lineup to be honest. Sure it is not Germany stacked, but our lineup eclipses countries like Italy. Alton has indeed declined horribly agreed, but I feel Thorpe has kind of taken the 'best park' title now, and you have other players like BPB and Paultons to keep it interesting. Merlin are a mediocre operator but they do sometimes come through, building a Mack Hyper is evidence lol. Aramark obviously is the worst food ever, but operations I feel aren't too bad, at Thorpe anyway. Hyperia and Stealth seem to always be doing impressive dispatches.
Thorpe nailed operations last year, I agree. I'd never seen trains get smashed out on Stealth so quickly.

Part of the reason why I think Alton Towers has gone down the pan, and I only think it gets rated higher than Thorpe due to the nostalgia and lore of it all. Nothing is impressive there any more give or take some nice theming and immersion.
 
my least common opinion is probably that i'm not bothered that i didn't get to ride either original top thrill dragster or kingda ka (there's no real way to say this without it sounding like i'm coping really hard 😂). i ride stealth and i'm like... yeah okay that was fine. i don't really care for the tophat-only layouts. then i ride formula rossa and think "wow, ka and dragster's launches must've been great too, and this ride has an actual layout afterwards! even better!"
 
I’m going to go in controversial today and say that I think that while undeniably doing very well for a park of its calibre, Paultons Park is somewhat overhyped.

I should preface this by saying that I’m not saying it’s a bad park by any stretch. It’s undeniably doing very good things for a regional park of its calibre, it has a very nice atmosphere and is a very low-stress experience with frequently limited crowds. However, there’s a lot of superlatives thrown around about it currently along the lines of “best park in the UK”, “one of the best parks in Europe” and all that jazz, and I’m not sure I agree. It’s very nice for a small, regional park, but I feel that it fundamentally is a small, regional park and people often gloss over this, act as though as it’s a major player, and look past some of its shortcomings. For me, it absolutely isn’t my favourite UK park, and there are a few reasons why.

The first thing I would say is that I think the park still doesn’t do particularly ambitious things in terms of ride hardware. And I don’t even mean from a thrill standpoint; I know very well that Paultons will likely never be a huge thrill park, and it would be unfair to assess them from this standpoint. I mean from the standpoint of custom rides that do interesting and unique things. Most of Paultons’ current coasters are clones or stock models, and even Drakon, while technically custom, looks like a pretty conservative example of a pretty conservative ride type that there are other, arguably more objectively impressive (I’ll phrase this carefully, as I’m reserving full judgement without having ridden) examples of within a relatively close radius. I think other UK parks do more ambitious ride hardware, even in the family thrill space that Paultons aims for at the higher end. For example, Merlin are building a Minecraft land at Chessington with a highly unique Intamin coaster at its centre, which I would argue shows more ambition than Valgard/Drakon, and a ride like Wicker Man is a considerably more impressive family thrill coaster than anything Paultons have produced, in my view. Even outside of Merlin, I would argue that Gold Rush at Drayton Manor is a more ambitious and unique family thrill coaster from a hardware standpoint than anything Paultons have yet produced. The rides are Paultons are fun and provide good, modern family coaster experiences, don’t get me wrong, but I think they perhaps lack that real standout attraction, and while I reserve full judgement on Drakon until Saturday, I’m not sure I see it changing that at present.

The second thing I would say is that while the park does do lovely, well-detailed themed lands that are very well-rounded, I think they maybe haven’t quite mastered theatre and pizzazz like Merlin at their best or some of the parks in Europe and the USA. As an example, I’d cite a land like the new-look Forbidden Valley at Alton Towers. There are some brilliant bits of theatre in the land like the giant eye and the station with the dispatch sequence, and there’s so much in the land that moves, makes noise, emits smoke or otherwise has some sort of effect. While admittedly rougher around the edges in some ways, it’s wonderfully dynamic in a way that I don’t think Paultons has quite achieved yet. I’d also cite Alton Manor; it’s a huge dark ride with custom scenes, effects, soundtrack and such, and other dark rides built by Merlin are similar. Ghostly Manor is fun, don’t get me wrong, but I just don’t think it’s in the same ballpark as Alton Manor, Ninjago, Sky Lion or other things Merlin have produced. That’s not to do down Paultons’ efforts at all, as their investments are detailed and well-rounded, but I think that theatre and spectacle is something that they don’t do quite as well as Merlin and some parks abroad.

For full clarity, that is not to say that I even vaguely dislike Paultons or think they are a bad park. They are doing a lot of things well, they have a very good product, they are undeniably investing well and I always enjoy a visit there; it’s definitely one of the better non-Merlin regional parks in the country for me, and they have an exciting future without a doubt. I just don’t think it’s the second coming of Christ like many seem to and I would not rate it as a top UK park for me personally.

I also think the “Paultons good, Merlin bad” sentiments often espoused lack nuance and I do think that while some of the criticisms levelled at Merlin are entirely fair, other issues are quite strongly exaggerated, but that’s probably a controversial opinion for its own post…
 
I’m going to go in controversial today and say that I think that while undeniably doing very well for a park of its calibre, Paultons Park is somewhat overhyped.

I should preface this by saying that I’m not saying it’s a bad park by any stretch. It’s undeniably doing very good things for a regional park of its has a very nice atmosphere and is a very low-stress experience with frequently limited crowds. However, there’s a lot of superlatives thrown around about it currently along the lines of “best park in the UK”, “one of the best parks in Europe” and all that jazz, and I’m not sure I agree. It’s very nice for a small, regional park, but I feel that it fundamentally is a small, regional park and people often gloss over this, act as though as it’s a major player, and look past some of its shortcomings. For me, it absolutely isn’t my favourite UK park, and there are a few reasons why.

The first thing I would say is that I think the park still doesn’t do particularly ambitious things in terms of ride hardware. And I don’t even mean from a thrill standpoint; I know very well that Paultons will likely never be a huge thrill park, and it would be unfair to assess them from this standpoint. I mean from the standpoint of custom rides that do interesting and unique things. Most of Paultons’ current coasters are clones or stock models, and even Drakon, while technically custom, looks like a pretty conservative example of a pretty conservative ride type that there are other, arguably more objectively impressive (I’ll phrase this carefully, as I’m reserving full judgement without having ridden) examples of within a relatively close radius. I think other UK parks do more ambitious ride hardware, even in the family thrill space that Paultons aims for at the higher end. For example, Merlin are building a Minecraft land at Chessington with a highly unique Intamin coaster at its centre, which I would argue shows more ambition than Valgard/Drakon, and a ride like Wicker Man is a considerably more impressive family thrill coaster than anything Paultons have produced, in my view. Even outside of Merlin, I would argue that Gold Rush at Drayton Manor is a more ambitious and unique family thrill coaster from a hardware standpoint than anything Paultons have yet produced. The rides are Paultons are fun and provide good, modern family coaster experiences, don’t get me wrong, but I think they perhaps lack that real standout attraction, and while I reserve full judgement on Drakon until Saturday, I’m not sure I see it changing that at present.

The second thing I would say is that while the park does do lovely, well-detailed themed lands that are very well-rounded, I think they maybe haven’t quite mastered theatre and pizzazz like Merlin at their best or some of the parks in Europe and the USA. As an example, I’d cite a land like the new-look Forbidden Valley at Alton Towers. There are some brilliant bits of theatre in the land like the giant eye and the station with the dispatch sequence, and there’s so much in the land that moves, makes noise, emits smoke or otherwise has some sort of effect. While admittedly rougher around the edges in some ways, it’s wonderfully dynamic in a way that I don’t think Paultons has quite achieved yet. I’d also cite Alton Manor; it’s a huge dark ride with custom scenes, effects, soundtrack and such, and other dark rides built by Merlin are similar. Ghostly Manor is fun, don’t get me wrong, but I just don’t think it’s in the same ballpark as Alton Manor, Ninjago, Sky Lion or other things Merlin have produced. That’s not to do down Paultons’ efforts at all, as their investments are detailed and well-rounded, but I think that theatre and spectacle is something that they don’t do quite as well as Merlin and some parks abroad.

For full clarity, that is not to say that I even vaguely dislike Paultons or think they are a bad park. They are doing a lot of things well, they have a very good product, they are undeniably investing well and I always enjoy a visit there; it’s definitely one of the better non-Merlin regional parks in the country for me, and they have an exciting future without a doubt. I just don’t think it’s the second coming of Christ like many seem to and I would not rate it as a top UK park for me personally.

I also think the “Paultons good, Merlin bad” sentiments often espoused lack nuance and I do think that while some of the criticisms levelled at Merlin are entirely fair, other issues are quite strongly exaggerated, but that’s probably a controversial opinion for its own post…

I've done a lot of visits recently, and I'd like to offer my counter-argument on the above.

For context, I have a Merlin Annual Pass, so I'm not coming at this from wanting to put down the Merlin parks because I like and want to visit them.

I would agree, ride for ride, yes, Paultons is probably relatively un remarkable. Most of the coasters are clones, and it's mostly little rides.

However, where I counter that Paultons is actually the best UK park is everything else other than the ride hardware.

Theming, scenery and landscaping wise I would argue Paultons greatly outshines the Merlin parks. Merlin are great at doing singular items of scenery (e.g. the Wicker Man), but typically don't fill in the little details as well. More importantly, Merlin also don't maintain aesthetics very well. Paultons on the other hand is consistently impeccable with a plethora of details which are carefully maintained.

Food at Paultons is affordable and much nicer is quality.

Merlin have a tendency to try and upcharge on everything. Whilst a day ticket for Paultons is more expensive per person than, say, Legoland, there's no parking charge and no fastrack.

Generally you can turn up at Paultons and do twice if not three times the number of rides in a day. It has a generally more relaxed atmosphere as well, which you noted.

I have a young child. The last trip I went to with her to Paultons on a Sunday I got on 14 rides, a mix of coasters and her smaller rides. We weren't even there all day. My daughter didn't have to pay for a ticket.

My last full day at Legoland on a weekday at the same time if year we did 3 rides in a whole day. My daughter did have to pay for a ticket.

I would rather ride Wicker Man than Storm Chaser, but I find that an overall day out at Paultons is probably unrivalled (for me at least) in the UK in terms of value and enjoyment for me.
 
Last edited:
There’s a lot to respond to there, and I think a lot of your points are valid, although I would argue that you have overstated some of your points - for example, who exactly is saying that Paultons is the second coming of Christ?! 😂 But overall I think these are great debates to have and I think you have expressed yourself really quite fairly, when so often on the internet and in forums there can be a tendency to approach things in a ‘thing I like is good, thing you like is bad’ manner so thank you for that.

I live in Southampton so Paultons is my local park. I can honestly tell you that I have a lot of conversations with friends, family and work colleagues (non-enthusiasts, all of them) who when they go to Paultons will tell me about how great their day was, how many rides they did etc etc and will also mention having been to Legoland or chessington and say about how negative it was in comparison. Yes, it is anecdotal but i can also tell you it is absolutely a real thing that families are experiencing and will comment on. My boss at work visited Paultons last week and he (unprompted by me, I might add) espoused these exact feelings from his visit.

I am a true Lego obsessive, my wife says I have too much in the house and my son also absolutely loves it. So naturally, we have had several good days out at Legoland. However….walking round mini land, I just felt it was really quite tired, lots of things that need repairing, things that should be painted, empty spaces in the displays that take away from the overall feel. I feel like it could be so much more and should be, it’s Lego after all, one of the world’s biggest IP’s! We also recently visited Warwick Castle, and whilst we found the hotel to be very good, the horrible histories maze was really quite disappointing, with displays that were very noticeably in need of painting or replacing altogether. And most of it was literally just a maze, with no content or theming in sight. Now, when I go to Paultons and stand in the middle of peppa pig world….it is a different story altogether. And that’s what I think your post is missing out on. Paultons just gives its guests that innate feeling, like the people that run the place deeply care about the guest experience. Like every little detail deserves to be taken care of because these are theme parks which are designed to be in their very essence places that make people feel happy.

There are so many points to be made about this, and I have so many thoughts on it that can’t really be appropriately expressed in a single forum post. I’d love to expand on the drastically better ride availability, lack of fast pass, sheer number of filler rides and attractions (and playgrounds!) - and the food, I mean the food in the route 83 diner is frankly in a different galaxy compared to the Aramark slop that Merlin serve up. If you’re a pure coaster enthusiast, sure, you can find better rides and you are correct to say that Paultons coaster line up is quite safe/tame. But even if Wicker Man is a better ride than anything Paultons has, should I be waiting an hour for it? When we already likely waited a similar time for (insert Smiler, Rita etc here). Oh and wait a minute, thirteen isnt open until midday. Oh and the rapids haven’t opened so far this year (and runaway mine train iirc?) oh and the monorail and sky ride are out of action too? Hopefully you get my point by now!

Have you considered that if people are overhyping Paultons it might be because their experience of other UK parks is so much worse in comparison? If you could pick up Paultons and drop it somewhere in the middle of Europe it likely wouldn’t stand out because so many parks there are operating in a similar way. The reason it stands out here is because very few (if any) are operating like it in the UK.
 
Thanks both for your interesting counter arguments!

You both make some fair points. I am perhaps quite a hardware and/or ride-focused enthusiast to a certain degree, more so than I like to admit, in terms of what pulls me to parks, and I think it probably doesn’t help that I’m also not really the target demographic of Paultons Park (I’m 22 years old, single and childless, and very frequently visit parks alone). I would (and do) happily visit Alton Towers and Thorpe Park at least once a year and frequently multiple times in a season, but don’t feel compelled to visit Paultons more than once a season, if that, despite the park being no further away than Thorpe and nearer than Towers. If I had children or was a child, I might feel differently, but I can’t help the demographic group I fall into.

On the theming front, as that seems to be the more contentious point of the two I raised, I will happily give Paultons plaudits on the level of small details they put into their lands and theming and how well rounded the things they do are. The park evidently has an eye for detail! However, I’ll admit I am a sucker for the grander scale, impactful theming and theatre that Merlin at their best do, I do think that Merlin at their best do incorporate some neat little details into their attractions themselves, and I don’t think Paultons quite matches that level of scale and pizzazz with their theming just yet. I think your opinion depends on what you value, as I think the two approaches have pros and cons. Paultons Park are perhaps better at fine details and finishing things off nicely, but the scale and theatre of their theming is much smaller and more understated. Merlin are perhaps slightly rougher around the edges in terms of overall finish, but build grander scale theming and integrate a bit more theatre, impact and panache (I’m going to try and use an alternative word to pizzazz!).

I don’t by any stretch mean that the park is bad or that I don’t enjoy it; they are doing brilliantly for a regional park of their calibre, the investment levels are excellent, they evidently put thought into guest experience and I always enjoy a day there! So in that sense, they do deserve praise. I guess when I feel that the park is overhyped, I mean when I hear things like people acting as though the park will be a serious competitor with Universal when it opens in 2031, or when I hear people act like the park is perfect and can do no wrong, or when I hear people act like it’s serious contender on the European scene. I like the park very much, but I think that level of praise and hype makes it into something that it isn’t; it is a small regional park with areas to improve and build upon.
 
Paulton's Park is the best run park in the UK, hands down.

Not a park for the thrill seeker, yet, I pretty much agree with most of the things you say Matt... But it's only just now starting to dip it's toes into this market, and the slow and steady approach they're taking, allowing the park to grow in real time with fans gained since Peppa Pig is genius, and the right approach imo.

As for theming, I do disagree. Paulton's theming is on point, it's more 'together' than Merlin's, which tends to be a bit random at times, even in Forbidden Valley, and what's more important is that that they maintain things to such a level that their theming works, and is as presentable 4 years down the line, as it was when it was first installed... That's hugely important.

You know that I'm usually a huge defender of Merlin, they're not nearly as bad as people like to paint them as being, we certainly could have worse looking at some US and European companies... And also, I've only been to Paulton's twice, so I'm certainly no fan boy... But there is no doubt in my mind, that if all of the Merlin Parks were run independently, by teams as competent as those at Paulton's, the parks would be much better off for it.
 
Paultons are a European park operating in the UK. Most other parks in the uk ape American parks.

I think what Paultons has done has offered a window into another, sustainable way to do things.

Ride for ride, Alton is better, but experience? Paultons every time.

The MAP is possibly the culprit though. Familiarity breeds contempt, and all of the merlin parks were at one point a breathtaking surprise to all of us. But the more we go, the more we queue, the more we eat sub standard meals and pay through our noses for them, peels away the magic.

Too many people get in at once, and they have to make up their lost revenue by cutting corners and price gauging.

It should really be much more expensive to get in, and standards would be easier to maintain, but they have got themselves stuck in a rut, and servicing a pile of debt.

What Paultons has done is lived within their means, and maintained high standards. That is all.


Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
 
I agree with @Matt N .

Paultons’ rides are quite mediocre, and I think the idea that they have the best theming in the UK is a bit over the top.

They do a good job with lots of nice details and attractive areas, but it feels more like very nicely decorated rides with a theme, rather than proper storytelling and theatre.

The lack of real theatricality is why, for me, Paultons’ rides never quite ‘click’ with guests the same way some of Merlin’s do.

You can have a pleasant day out at Paultons, but you’re unlikely to come away with any truly memorable individual attractions.

Honestly, if Paultons could convince someone like John Wardley to do a lap of the park and give them some advice on adding a bit more theatricality, they could really improve the whole experience without changing any of the existing ride hardware!
 
I’m going to go in controversial today and say that I think that while undeniably doing very well for a park of its calibre, Paultons Park is somewhat overhyped.

I should preface this by saying that I’m not saying it’s a bad park by any stretch. It’s undeniably doing very good things for a regional park of its calibre, it has a very nice atmosphere and is a very low-stress experience with frequently limited crowds. However, there’s a lot of superlatives thrown around about it currently along the lines of “best park in the UK”, “one of the best parks in Europe” and all that jazz, and I’m not sure I agree. It’s very nice for a small, regional park, but I feel that it fundamentally is a small, regional park and people often gloss over this, act as though as it’s a major player, and look past some of its shortcomings. For me, it absolutely isn’t my favourite UK park, and there are a few reasons why.

The first thing I would say is that I think the park still doesn’t do particularly ambitious things in terms of ride hardware. And I don’t even mean from a thrill standpoint; I know very well that Paultons will likely never be a huge thrill park, and it would be unfair to assess them from this standpoint. I mean from the standpoint of custom rides that do interesting and unique things. Most of Paultons’ current coasters are clones or stock models, and even Drakon, while technically custom, looks like a pretty conservative example of a pretty conservative ride type that there are other, arguably more objectively impressive (I’ll phrase this carefully, as I’m reserving full judgement without having ridden) examples of within a relatively close radius. I think other UK parks do more ambitious ride hardware, even in the family thrill space that Paultons aims for at the higher end. For example, Merlin are building a Minecraft land at Chessington with a highly unique Intamin coaster at its centre, which I would argue shows more ambition than Valgard/Drakon, and a ride like Wicker Man is a considerably more impressive family thrill coaster than anything Paultons have produced, in my view. Even outside of Merlin, I would argue that Gold Rush at Drayton Manor is a more ambitious and unique family thrill coaster from a hardware standpoint than anything Paultons have yet produced. The rides are Paultons are fun and provide good, modern family coaster experiences, don’t get me wrong, but I think they perhaps lack that real standout attraction, and while I reserve full judgement on Drakon until Saturday, I’m not sure I see it changing that at present.

The second thing I would say is that while the park does do lovely, well-detailed themed lands that are very well-rounded, I think they maybe haven’t quite mastered theatre and pizzazz like Merlin at their best or some of the parks in Europe and the USA. As an example, I’d cite a land like the new-look Forbidden Valley at Alton Towers. There are some brilliant bits of theatre in the land like the giant eye and the station with the dispatch sequence, and there’s so much in the land that moves, makes noise, emits smoke or otherwise has some sort of effect. While admittedly rougher around the edges in some ways, it’s wonderfully dynamic in a way that I don’t think Paultons has quite achieved yet. I’d also cite Alton Manor; it’s a huge dark ride with custom scenes, effects, soundtrack and such, and other dark rides built by Merlin are similar. Ghostly Manor is fun, don’t get me wrong, but I just don’t think it’s in the same ballpark as Alton Manor, Ninjago, Sky Lion or other things Merlin have produced. That’s not to do down Paultons’ efforts at all, as their investments are detailed and well-rounded, but I think that theatre and spectacle is something that they don’t do quite as well as Merlin and some parks abroad.

For full clarity, that is not to say that I even vaguely dislike Paultons or think they are a bad park. They are doing a lot of things well, they have a very good product, they are undeniably investing well and I always enjoy a visit there; it’s definitely one of the better non-Merlin regional parks in the country for me, and they have an exciting future without a doubt. I just don’t think it’s the second coming of Christ like many seem to and I would not rate it as a top UK park for me personally.

I also think the “Paultons good, Merlin bad” sentiments often espoused lack nuance and I do think that while some of the criticisms levelled at Merlin are entirely fair, other issues are quite strongly exaggerated, but that’s probably a controversial opinion for its own post…
For what it is, Paultons are exceeding expectations massively with their growth.

Before Cobra and Edge, it was basically a small theme park for the tourist market in the area along the lines of Flambards. It even had exhibitions in the same vein as them back in the day.

They were lucky they've picked up Peppa Pig before Merlin managed to acquire it for the rest of the world however you are right that they do seem to be cautious with their broadening of audience.

I would've thought the Eurofighter would've come before Lost Kingdom.

The Paultons vs Merlin debate is definitely like comparing David and Goliath.

I will however say this as this is a place seen through rose tinted nostalgia glasses, Alton Towers is massively overhyped and if it wasn't as well known as a household name, it would have a fate not too dissimilar to Oakwood. It is only a major player in the theme park market purely based on nostalgia in my view.
 
I got a controversial, and I mean, CONTREVIERISAL one: RMC is not that good, and actually one of my least favorite manufacturers.
Now, put down your pitchforks, and let me explain.
My first RMC was Outlaw Run at Silver Dollar City. Now, I won't get into much detail, but after a literal crying meltdown on powder keg, I was scared. But when I rode it front row, the wind blowing, the speed, and the inversions did something to me. That was actually the ride that made me an enthusiast.
So what happened to make me say this opinion? Well, four things.
1. I rode Outlaw Run the next year, only this time, it was in the back row. I did do something involving point 2 and 3 in between, but I'll get to that. The back row was AWFUL. I genuinely got whiplash, bruised my back and neck, and had to sit down and take a break with the barn swing or something else to recover. From then on, I made SURE to always ride Outlaw Run in the front, or close to front.
2. I went to Magic Mountain, and was able to experience my first ever IBOX and Raptor coasters with Wonder Woman, the first ride of the day, and Twisted Colossus. Wonder Woman was... fine. The restraints were uncomfortable, and the lift did lean from side to side, which was a little too much, but it did produce enough forces where it made me unintentionally black out. Twisted Colossus, on the other hand, was pretty fun. The trains were a little more uncomfortable, and since I had an expander, my tongue would keep hitting it. It also made me black out on the drops. (I have gotten better at handling G forces since then). The main problem was... it was kind of overhyped. I liked it, but I loved rides like Full throttle, and Tatsu a lot more (X^2 didn't get a fair comparison, since I saw the supports swaying before riding, and was too terrified to enjoy). It was slow, and I expected more from what was number 2 or 1 on many enthusiasts charts.
3. I went to Cedar Point in almost a year from now, May 29 and 30th, 2025. The park had so many rides I loved. Top Thrill (my #1), Valravan, Millennium Force, Maverick (all fighting for #2), and a few others. One that was too hyped, in my opinion, was Steel Vengeance. I did gain quite some weight since the last RMC, but not the level where it would be uncomfortable. The operators shoved the restraint down, nearly breaking my pelvis. The entire ride was uncomfortable, with my pelvis slamming on the bar on even the smallest hills. (this is why I prefer either soft Lap bars like top thrill or Velocicoaster, or even OTSR over hard lap bars) The transition between the pre-lift and lift was awful, feeling like it was going to break my neck. The inversions were fun, and some floater airtime moments were amazing, but every single ejector hill slammed into my Pelvis, and I felt like I was going to be killed from internal bleeding due to how much I was hit before the final brakes. Out of my 67(I hate that number) roller coasters I have ridden, subject to change if I go to Frontier City or Six Flags Over Texas, Vengeance is not even in my top 10, nor are any other RMCs I have ridden. "Thank you for coming to my TED Talk."
 
I have another: Comfort Collars are not the worst restraint, and they can help on some rides. Don't get me wrong, on rides like West Coast Racers, they suck. They get in the way, and can be a pain to put on, and overall just make dispatches longer. HOWEVER, on some rides, like Big Apple Coaster, they change the game crazily. Originally, BAC as I will be referring to it, had over the shoulder restraints, which banged people's head around. Now, the payoff is uncomfortable while putting on, but a much better, and looser ride. Also, restraints like pure metal lap bars (Cedar Creek Mine Ride) SUCK!!! Magnum has some padding, but there is none on the Cedar Creek Mind Wrecker. I was thrown around, hitting side to side of train. THAT is a bad restraint, SINCE IT DOESN'T EVEN KEEP YOU SECURE!!!
 
My newest opinion is: I don't think it's that unreasonable for a big deal to be made out of making guests walk down the lift hill of a coaster during an evacuation, especially if it's a tall ride.

Generally the enthusiast reaction out of a news article made about a roller coaster evacuation is "it's not that big of a deal, they stopped the ride because it was unsafe to do so, the park is doing this because it's the safest thing for a guest to do".
But if I didn't know anything about coasters and I was made to walk down a flight of stairs 150ft in the air because the coaster I was going to ride suddenly became too unsafe to continue, then I would also be talking to everyone I know.
I understand that parks are put into an extremely difficult place when they have to make the decision to evac, it's either send them down the stairs or send them through a ride that has potentially become unsafe for one reason or another.

It's good to make people aware that "this was literally the only option, people are being let out because all of the safety features were working correctly and as intended". But at the same time, if you're raising your eyebrow at someone for being concerned about a group having to go down a completely open-air flight of stairs potentially a hundred feet in the air, then I think you're being a little bit silly.

I get shaky legs when looking over a 15ft drop, even if there's a railing to protect me. 20ft has me legitimately feeling dizzy. If anything I have respect for the people who have gone through a lift hill evac.
 
Recently visited a lot of parks in the UK for the first time and gained a couple of unusual opinions along the way. The most unusual of which might just be that Joyland in Great Yarmouth is a top 3 park in the country. 9 extremely silly rides all crammed in a space less than half the size of boardwalk bullet with incredibly charming theming/scenery all around, what's not to love?
 
Back
Top